The best Tradogram alternatives are 1. Procurify 2. Precoro 3. Zapro 4. ProcureDesk 5. Order.co 6. ProcurementExpress 7. Spendwise.
The best Tradogram alternative depends on your team size, budget and the add-ons you pay for. Procurify and Precoro fit mid-sized teams that want requests, receiving and matching in the base product. ProcureDesk suits catalog buying, Order.co multi-site supplies, and Spendwise very small teams. For sourcing and contracts with unlimited users, look at Zapro.
Tradogram competitors: key takeaways
Procurify: Best for mid-sized teams that want a like-for-like swap with many requesters, since Basic users are unlimited, plus supplier payments to 190+ countries.
Precoro: Best for mid-sized teams across several sites or entities that want 2-way and 3-way matching in the entry plan, from $499 a month billed yearly.
Zapro: Best for mid-market teams that want requests, POs, RFI and RFP sourcing and contracts in one plan with unlimited users, from $699 a month. Your bank or ERP still pays suppliers.
ProcureDesk: Best for finance-led US teams that buy from catalogs, with 200+ punch-out catalogs and a stated 2 to 3 week go-live, from $830 a month with 10 users.
Order.co: Best for multi-location businesses buying operating supplies, with one cart across 40,000+ suppliers and one consolidated bill.
ProcurementExpress: Best for nonprofits and grant-funded teams that want PO approvals with budget checks, priced by monthly spend from $415 a month, not by user.
Spendwise: Best for very small teams that need requests, POs and receiving, from $9 per user per month on a Basic plan for up to 5 users.
Tradogram alternatives compared
Tradogram alternatives fall into three groups: mid-market procure-to-pay (Procurify, Precoro, Zapro, ProcureDesk), multi-location supply buying (Order.co) and low-cost PO tools for small or grant-funded teams (ProcurementExpress, Spendwise). The table compares who each tool is built for, its key features, ERP integrations, starting price and G2 rating.
| Tool | Best for | Key features | ERP integrations | Starting price | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budget PO control with add-on modules | POs, TradoCart, AI invoice capture, TradoPay to 150+ countries; requisitions, RFx and receiving on Premium | QuickBooks Online and Desktop, Xero, NetSuite, Sage, Dynamics 365 Business Central (paid add-on) | $99 a month (Essentials) plus a per-user fee | G2 4.3 (37) | |
| Mid-sized procure-to-pay | Requests, approvals, POs, receiving; AP add-on with 2-way and 3-way matching; payments to 190+ countries | NetSuite, QuickBooks Online and Desktop, Sage Intacct, Dynamics 365 Business Central | Quote by Pro users; Vendr buyer data: median $15,000 a year | G2 4.6 (415) | |
| Multi-site, multi-entity teams | Requests, POs, receipts, 2-way and 3-way matching on Core; RFPs, punch-out and AI capture on Automation | QuickBooks Online and Xero on Core; NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Dynamics 365 Business Central | $499 a month (Core, billed yearly) | G2 4.7 (225) | |
| Mid-market intake-to-pay with sourcing | Intake, approvals, POs, RFI/RFP sourcing, contracts, 2-way and 3-way matching | NetSuite, QuickBooks, Sage Intacct, SAP, Oracle, Workday, Dynamics | $699 per month, unlimited users | G2 4.7 (14) | |
| Catalog buying and domestic bill pay | Requests, POs, 200+ punch-out catalogs, 3-way matching with OCR, domestic bill pay | QuickBooks, Xero, NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Dynamics 365; SAP S/4HANA on Enterprise | $830 a month billed yearly (10 users) | G2 4.4 (51) | |
| Multi-location supply buying | One cart across 40,000+ suppliers, approvals by location, virtual cards, one consolidated bill | QuickBooks Online, NetSuite, Sage Intacct | Quote | G2 4.4 (155) | |
| Grant-funded nonprofits | Requests and PO approvals with budget checks, SAM.gov screening, Amazon punch-out from Better | QuickBooks from Basic, Sage 50 and Sage 200 by plan; NetSuite and Dynamics on Enterprise | $415 a month (up to $10,000 spend a month) | G2 4.7 (61) | |
| Very small purchasing teams | Requests, POs, receiving, 3-way matching, budgets on Pro, inventory add-on | Accounting integrations sold as an add-on | $9 per user per month | G2 4.7 (75) |
Find your Tradogram alternative
Choose a Tradogram alternative by matching it to your job, team size, ERP and budget. Tradogram competitors differ most in what the entry plan includes. Some bundle requests, receiving and matching. Tradogram Essentials sells them as add-ons. Pick the tab that fits your situation, then check the reasons teams leave below, and what fixes each one.
What you use Tradogram for
Team size
Your ERP
Budget
Why teams leave Tradogram, and what fixes it
Teams leave Tradogram mainly over add-ons. The $99 Essentials plan sells requisitions, receiving and sourcing as extras, and per-user and integration fees sit on top. We found no counted review set for Tradogram, so these reasons come from its own pricing page, checked 12 November 2026. Each reason shows the alternative that fixes it and what to test.
What Tradogram does well: a published $99 entry price and TradoPay supplier payments to 150+ countries on Essentials. Its TradoCart also turns Amazon, Costco and Home Depot carts into POs without punch-out setup.
What Tradogram doesn't cover, and who does
Tradogram covers POs, supplier management, payments and expense management on its entry plan. Its own pricing page shows the gaps. Purchase requisitions, receiving and sourcing are Essentials add-ons, and unlimited users come only on Scale. Per-user, integration and setup fees sit outside the plan. The table shows which alternatives include each one.
| If you need | In Tradogram | Alternatives that include it |
|---|---|---|
| Requisitions and receiving on the entry plan | Add-ons on Essentials; included in Premium (quote) | |
| Sourcing events without an add-on | RFQ and RFP are an Essentials add-on; included in Premium | |
| Unlimited users below the top plan | Unlimited users on Scale only, by quote | |
| Published per-user prices | Plan fee plus a per-user fee whose amount the pricing page does not show | |
| Accounting sync in the entry plan | ERP integrations are a paid add-on on all plans | |
| Setup with a stated go-live time | Implementation is a paid add-on on all plans |
The 7 best Tradogram alternatives, reviewed
Each review below shows what the tool is built for, its key features, pros, cons, pricing and the buyer it fits best. Procurify, Precoro and ProcureDesk cover requests, POs, receiving and matching, Zapro adds sourcing and contracts, Order.co covers supply buying with one bill, and ProcurementExpress and Spendwise cover simple PO approvals.
Procurify: best for mid-sized procure-to-pay
Best for Mid-sized procure-to-pay
Procurify fits mid-sized teams that want the request-to-payment flow Tradogram sells in Premium, with requesters at no extra cost. It covers requests, approvals, POs, receiving, 2-way and 3-way matching and payments to 190+ countries. Every customer starts on the base Purchasing product and adds AP, cards, intake or contracts, each priced by quote.
Key features 6 features
- Requests, approvals and POs in the base product
- Line-level receiving with packing slips
- Automated 2-way and 3-way matching in the AP product
- Payments to 190+ countries from inside Procurify
- Punch-outs to Amazon Business, Staples, Home Depot and Grainger
- iOS and Android apps for requests, approvals and receiving
Pros and cons 3 pros, 2 cons
Pros
- Unlimited Basic users: only Pro users drive the quote, so occasional requesters do not add to the cost the way Tradogram's per-user fee does
- Published rollouts: 4 weeks on Basic and 8 on Standard, so you can plan the switch from Tradogram with real dates
- Mobile apps: requests, approvals and receiving work on iOS and Android, which helps teams spread across sites
Cons
- Modular quote: AP, cards, Guided Intake and Contracts are priced on top of the base product, so the full set costs more than Purchasing alone
- No sourcing: its platform page shows no sourcing or RFx events, so teams that run RFQs in Tradogram need another tool
Pricing
Quote only, built from products, add-ons, Pro users and integrations; Basic users are unlimited. Vendr buyer data shows a median of $15,000 a year, from $4,210 to $40,000.
Best for
Mid-sized companies with many requesters and a small group of buyers who want purchasing and supplier payments from one vendor and do not run sourcing events.
Verdict
Verdict: Procurify is a like-for-like move from Tradogram for teams with many requesters. Get the full module quote in writing, because the base product covers purchasing only.
Precoro: best for multi-site, multi-entity teams
Best for Multi-site, multi-entity teams
Precoro fits mid-sized companies with many sites or entities that want requests, receipts and matching in the entry plan. Its Core plan, from $499 a month billed yearly, includes POs, receipts and 2-way and 3-way matching. The trade-off: punch-out, AI capture, RFPs and supplier onboarding start on the $999 Automation plan.
Key features 5 features
- No-code approvals by department, amount or project, with Slack, Teams and mobile approvals
- Bulk, blanket, recurring and service POs
- Receipts that track what arrived against what was ordered
- RFPs through a supplier portal (Automation plan)
- ACH, same-day ACH, wire and international payments for approved invoices
Pros and cons 3 pros, 2 cons
Pros
- Published prices: Core starts at $499 a month and Automation at $999, billed yearly, so you can budget before a demo
- Fast go-live: Precoro states 2 to 8 weeks with no IT involvement, which suits lean finance teams
- No lock-in: there is no formal contract and 30 days' notice to cancel, so a first year carries little risk
Cons
- Gated features: punch-out, AI capture, RFPs and supplier onboarding start on the $999 Automation plan, so the $499 price covers less
- User limits: unlimited users come only on the custom Enterprise plan, so cost can rise as more approvers join
Pricing
Core from $499 a month and Automation from $999 a month, both billed yearly; Enterprise is custom. A standalone AP Module starts at $499 a month.
Best for
Mid-sized companies with several locations or entities that want requests, receipts and 3-way matching in the entry plan at a published price.
Verdict
Verdict: Precoro is a like-for-like step up from Tradogram Essentials. Check which features sit on Automation before you compare prices.
Zapro: best for mid-market intake-to-pay with sourcing
Best for Mid-market intake-to-pay with sourcing
Zapro is a strong Tradogram alternative for mid-market teams whose gap is requisitions, sourcing and contracts sold as add-ons. This AI-native procurement software covers intake, approvals, sourcing, contracts, POs and invoice matching, with unlimited users. Plans start at $699 a month, and your bank or ERP pays suppliers.
Key features 5 features
- Approvals routed by amount, category or vendor, in series or in parallel
- RFI and RFP events on all plans; auctions on Scale
- Contracts with renewal alerts; contract authoring on Growth
- 2-way and 3-way matching with an exception queue (3-way on Growth and up)
- Amazon Business punch-out through Zapro's approvals and budgets
Pros and cons 3 pros, 3 cons
Pros
- Unlimited users: all plans include unlimited users, so the price does not climb as more requesters and approvers join
- Published prices: Spark is $699 a month and Growth $1,999, so you can budget before you talk to sales
- Basic sourcing: RFI and RFP events come on all plans, so supplier bids do not need a separate add-on
Cons
- No payments: Zapro prepares payment batches, but your bank or ERP sends the money, while Tradogram pays suppliers through TradoPay
- Vendor caps: Spark covers up to 50 active vendors and Growth up to 500, so teams with many suppliers need a higher tier
- Higher entry price: Spark at $699 a month costs more than Tradogram Essentials at $99, so very small teams may pay for more than they use
Pricing
Spark $699 a month (up to 50 vendors), Growth $1,999 a month (up to 500 vendors), Scale on custom pricing, as published on zapro.ai in November 2026. The pricing page lists 3-way matching and contract authoring in the Growth plan's AI suite.
Best for
Mid-market finance and procurement teams that want requests, sourcing and contracts in one plan without per-user fees, and keep paying suppliers from their own bank.
Verdict
Verdict: Pick Zapro if Tradogram's add-ons and user fees are the reason you are leaving. Stay on Tradogram Essentials if you only need POs and TradoPay for a few people.
ProcureDesk: best for catalog buying and domestic bill pay
Best for Catalog buying and domestic bill pay
ProcureDesk fits finance teams at growing US companies that buy a lot from catalogs and want domestic bill pay. It lists 200+ punch-out catalogs, 3-way matching with OCR and payments by ACH, check or virtual card. Its pricing page states go-live in 2 to 3 weeks, and plans include 10 or 20 users before a $20 monthly fee each.
Key features 4 features
- 200+ punch-out catalogs, including Amazon Business, Grainger, Staples and CDW
- Requests, approvals, receipts and 3-way matching with OCR on all plans
- Budget tracking and spend analysis on all plans
- Bill pay by ACH, check and virtual card
Pros and cons 3 pros, 3 cons
Pros
- Done-for-you setup: ProcureDesk handles the initial setup, so finance teams spend little of their own time on the rollout
- Low-risk start: a 30-day money-back guarantee and no contract on monthly plans make it easy to trial with real orders
- Catalog buying: 200+ punch-out catalogs suit teams that liked TradoCart for buying from online stores
Cons
- Domestic payments only: it pays by ACH and check, so international wires stay in your existing payment process, unlike TradoPay
- User caps: plans include 10 or 20 users, then $20 a month each, so cost rises as more people request or approve
- No sourcing: contracts are an add-on and its site shows no RFx events, so teams that run supplier bids need another tool
Pricing
Startup $830 a month billed yearly ($9,960 a year, 10 users), Growth $1,250 a month ($15,000 a year, 20 users), plus $20 a month per extra user. Enterprise is custom.
Best for
Controllers at US companies under 250 employees who buy most supplies from large online catalogs and want a fast, hands-off setup.
Verdict
Verdict: ProcureDesk fits finance-led catalog buying with a fast setup. Pick something else if you pay many suppliers abroad, which TradoPay handles today.
Order.co: best for multi-location supply buying
Best for Multi-location supply buying
Order.co fits multi-location companies that buy the same operating supplies across many sites. Teams order from one cart across their own vendors and a network of 40,000+ suppliers. Order.co then pays the vendors and sends one consolidated bill, which is a different model from Tradogram's PO-and-invoice flow.
Key features 4 features
- One cart across marketplace suppliers and your own vendors
- Approval rules by location, cost center, role or spend threshold
- Vendor-locked virtual cards
- AI Sourcing that suggests cheaper sellers for the same item
Pros and cons 3 pros, 4 cons
Pros
- One bill: Order.co pays vendors and sends one consolidated bill, so AP handles one invoice instead of many supplier bills
- Stated rollout: 4 to 6 weeks for most mid-market multi-location teams, per Order.co, so you can plan the cutover
- Many vendors, one login: 13 of 30 recent reviewers praised buying from many vendors in one place, which suits site managers
Cons
- Catalog gaps: out-of-stock items and weak substitutions were the top complaint, in 8 of 30 recent reviews, so check your core items
- No public pricing: there is no pricing page, so you cannot compare cost with Tradogram's $99 plan before a demo
- Supplies focus: it is built for operating supplies, so services and RFx sourcing events get little depth
- Thin reporting: 5 of 30 recent reviewers found reporting limited, so ask to see your own spend report in the demo
Pricing
Quote only, with no public pricing page.
Best for
Operations leaders at multi-location businesses, such as coworking spaces, hotels or childcare centers, that buy the same supplies across sites.
Verdict
Verdict: Order.co is a different model from Tradogram: a marketplace plus payments, not configurable software. Pick it if one monthly bill matters more than choosing your own suppliers.
ProcurementExpress: best for grant-funded nonprofits
Best for Grant-funded nonprofits
ProcurementExpress fits nonprofits and grant-funded teams that need PO approvals with budget checks next to their accounting system. Plans are priced by monthly managed spend, not by user, from $415 a month. It adds SAM.gov screening and 2 CFR 200 support, but NetSuite and Dynamics connections need the Enterprise plan.
Key features 4 features
- Requests and PO approvals with remaining budget shown
- SAM.gov screening and 2 CFR 200 compliance support
- Amazon punch-out from the Better plan
- Scan & Match invoice matching from the Best plan
Pros and cons 3 pros, 3 cons
Pros
- Spend-based pricing: plans are priced by monthly spend, not users, so adding requesters does not raise the bill
- Free trial: a 14-day trial with all features and no credit card lets you test approvals on real orders first
- Grant compliance: SAM.gov screening and 2 CFR 200 support suit teams that report spend to funders
Cons
- ERP limits: NetSuite and Dynamics connections need the Enterprise plan, which is priced by quote
- Matching on top tiers: Scan & Match invoice matching starts on the $2,550 Best plan, so smaller plans match invoices by hand
- Punch-out by plan: Amazon punch-out starts on the $900 Better plan, so Basic teams that buy on Amazon need to upgrade
Pricing
Basic $415 a month (up to $10,000 spend a month), Better $900 (up to $1 million), Best $2,550 (up to $10 million), Enterprise by quote.
Best for
Nonprofits and grant-funded organizations that need PO approvals with budget checks and audit-ready records, and use QuickBooks or Sage.
Verdict
Verdict: ProcurementExpress suits grant-funded teams that report spend to funders. Companies outside that sector may want more purchasing depth.
Spendwise: best for very small purchasing teams
Best for Very small purchasing teams
Spendwise fits very small teams that want requests, POs and receiving for less than Tradogram's entry plan. It covers approvals, receiving with partial deliveries, 3-way matching, budgets and inventory alerts, from $9 per user per month. Basic allows 10 transactions a month for up to 5 users, and approval workflows and budgets need the $19 Pro plan.
Key features 4 features
- Purchase requests from any device, with budget checks
- Receiving, even when only part of an order arrives
- 3-way matching and duplicate-payment checks
- Low-stock inventory alerts (add-on)
Pros and cons 2 pros, 3 cons
Pros
- Low entry price: Basic is $9 per user per month, so a team of up to 5 people pays less than Tradogram's $99 plan
- Quick start: Spendwise offers a free trial and says most customers are up and running within a few weeks
Cons
- Transaction cap: Basic allows only 10 transactions a month for up to 5 users, so active buyers outgrow it fast
- Pro for workflows: approval limits, workflows and budgets need the $19 Pro plan, which has a 5-user minimum
- Paid extras: accounting integrations and the Amazon connection are add-ons, so the real cost is higher than the per-user price
Pricing
Basic $9 per user per month (1 to 5 users, 10 transactions a month), Pro $19 per user per month (5 to 50 users), Enterprise by quote.
Best for
Very small teams, such as a single office or a small chain, that want requests, POs and receiving for less than Tradogram's entry plan.
Verdict
Verdict: Spendwise is a low-cost way out of Tradogram for a handful of buyers. Per-user pricing adds up once dozens of people need access.
Also worth a look: Coupa and SAP Ariba, enterprise source-to-pay suites with sourcing and contracts, both priced by quote. Kissflow Procurement Cloud runs low-code intake, approvals and matching around an existing ERP, which keeps the payment run. Tipalti suits teams whose main need is AP and global payouts, with AP from $99 a month plus transaction fees.
Tradogram alternatives: feature-by-feature comparison
Compare Tradogram alternatives on the purchasing work you do every day: requests and POs, approvals, invoice capture and matching, sourcing and contracts, and supplier payments. All seven alternatives cover part of this procure-to-pay flow, so the grid includes each one, with Tradogram first as the baseline and plan limits noted.
| Tool | Requests and POs | Approvals | Invoice capture and matching | Sourcing and contracts | Supplier payments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POs on all plans; requisitions on Premium or as add-on | By amount, department, GL code or project | AI invoice capture and automated three-way matching | RFQ, RFP and contracts on Premium; add-ons on Essentials | TradoPay, cross-border to 150+ countries | |
| Order requests and POs in the base product | By department, location, account code or amount | AP add-on; 2-way and 3-way matching | Contracts add-on; no sourcing events | ACH, check, wire; payments to 190+ countries | |
| Requests to POs; blanket, recurring and service orders | No-code routing; email, Slack, Teams or mobile | 2-way and 3-way on Core; AI capture on Automation | RFPs on Automation; contract repository | ACH, same-day ACH, wire and international transfers | |
| Intake, catalog, Amazon Business punch-out, request to PO | Routed by amount, category or vendor | OCR capture; 2-way matching, 3-way on Growth | RFI and RFP on all plans; contract authoring on Growth | Prepares the payment batch; your ERP or bank pays | |
| Requests, POs and blanket POs on all plans | All plans; auto-escalation on Enterprise | 3-way match with OCR from Startup | Contracts add-on; no sourcing events | Domestic ACH, check and virtual card | |
| One cart across vendors; requisitions become POs | By location, cost center, role or spend threshold | Invoice filled from your orders; line-level GL coding | AI Sourcing suggests cheaper vendors; no RFx | Order.co pays vendors and sends one bill | |
| Requests and PO approvals with budget checks | Routed to approvers with remaining budget shown | Scan & Match from the Best plan | SAM.gov screening on orders | Audit-ready PO and invoice records for accounting | |
| Requests from any device become POs | Routed approvals; limits and workflows on Pro | 3-way matching and duplicate-payment checks | Central supplier list with buying controls | Invoice checks that stop paying the same bill twice |
How Tradogram alternatives charge
Tradogram pricing starts at $99 a month for Essentials, plus a per-user fee and paid add-ons. Its competitors charge by flat plan (Precoro, ProcureDesk, Zapro), by user (Spendwise), by managed spend (ProcurementExpress) or by quote (Procurify, Order.co). Compare at your real users and modules, for example against flat Zapro pricing.
| Tool | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Plan fee plus per-user fee and add-ons | $99 per month (Essentials) | |
| Quote, by modules and Pro users | Vendr median $15,000 a year | |
| Flat plan, billed yearly; user limits by tier | $499 per month | |
| Flat monthly plan by active vendors; unlimited users | $699 per month | |
| Platform fee with users included, then $20 per user | $830 per month | |
| Quote | Quote | |
| Monthly fee by managed spend | $415 per month | |
| Per user per month | $9 per user |
Questions to ask any Tradogram alternative
Before you choose a Tradogram alternative, ask every vendor five questions in writing. Which modules are in the plan? What does each extra user cost? Is your accounting system included? Who does the setup, and how fast? Can you run an RFQ with suppliers? Strong answers name a plan and a price, and are shown live on your own data.
| Question | Why it matters | What a strong answer includes |
|---|---|---|
| Which of our modules are in the plan, and which are add-ons? | Add-ons are how a $99 plan grows. | A written list of every module you need, marked included or priced. |
| What does each extra user cost? | Per-user fees grow with every requester and approver. | A fixed price per user, or unlimited users. |
| Is our accounting system included? | Paid connectors add cost and setup time, and gaps hurt spend visibility. | Your system named, with what syncs and on which plan. |
| Who does the setup, and how long does it take? | Setup is a paid add-on at some vendors. | A dated plan with the vendor's hours and your team's hours. |
| Can we run an RFQ with our suppliers? | Sourcing sits behind add-ons or higher tiers at many vendors. | A live RFQ in the demo, from request to award. |
Which Tradogram alternative should you choose in 2027?
The best Tradogram alternative depends on your team size and which add-ons you pay for today. For a like-for-like swap, start with Procurify or Precoro. ProcureDesk suits catalog buying, Order.co multi-site supplies, and Spendwise or ProcurementExpress very small or grant-funded teams. If you want sourcing and contracts with unlimited users, look at Zapro.
A practical shortlist for a growing team is Procurify, Precoro and Zapro, plus ProcureDesk if you buy mostly from online catalogs. Price each with your real modules and users, and use our procurement ROI calculator to size the payback with your own volumes.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best alternative to Tradogram?
For most growing teams, Procurify or Precoro is the best Tradogram alternative. Both cover requests, receiving and matching, and Precoro's $499 Core plan includes 2-way and 3-way matching. Zapro suits teams that also want sourcing and contracts with unlimited users, and Spendwise suits very small teams.
Who are Tradogram's main competitors?
Tradogram's main competitors are Procurify, Precoro, ProcureDesk and Zapro in mid-market purchasing. Order.co competes for multi-location supply buying, ProcurementExpress and Spendwise for small teams, and Coupa, SAP Ariba and Kissflow at larger companies.
What is Tradogram's pricing?
Tradogram pricing starts at $99 a month, or $950.40 a year, for Essentials, plus a per-user fee. Premium starts at 20+ users and Scale adds unlimited users, both by quote. ERP integrations, SSO, API access, punch-out and implementation cost extra on all plans.
Tradogram vs Procurify: which is better?
Tradogram is cheaper to start and includes TradoPay supplier payments to 150+ countries on Essentials. Procurify includes requests and line-level receiving in its base product and keeps Basic users unlimited, but sells by quote, with a Vendr median of $15,000 a year.
What do Tradogram reviews say?
Tradogram holds 4.3 out of 5 on G2 from 37 reviews, checked 12 November 2026. That is a small sample next to Procurify's 415 reviews, so the reasons to leave on this page come from Tradogram's own pricing page rather than counted review themes.
What are some examples of procurement software?
Examples of procurement software include Procurify, Precoro, Zapro, ProcureDesk and Tradogram for mid-sized teams, and Coupa and SAP Ariba for large enterprises. Order.co combines a supplier marketplace with payments, and Spendwise and ProcurementExpress suit small teams.
Is there cheaper software like Tradogram?
Yes. Spendwise starts at $9 per user per month, so a team of up to 5 users pays less than Tradogram's $99 Essentials plan. Its Basic plan allows only 10 transactions a month, and approval workflows need the $19 Pro plan with a 5-user minimum.
One price, the full suite
See how Zapro runs requests, approvals, RFI and RFP sourcing and contracts for a mid-market team, with unlimited users on all plans.
Sources: Tradogram pricing; Tradogram reviews on G2; Precoro pricing; ProcureDesk pricing; ProcurementExpress pricing; Procurify on Vendr.



